This week, the New Scientist published a new article about the “fish therapy” market.
The article was based on data from the fish therapy industry, which includes some of the largest suppliers of fish therapy.
In short, it was a fascinating study.
Here’s a summary of what we learned: The industry has been booming in the past decade, and there are more than 2,000 suppliers of its products worldwide.
But what is fish therapy?
And what is the difference between fish therapy for a fish and fish therapy to treat a person?
What is fish and is it medicine?
And, more importantly, are there any real differences between the two?
To answer these questions, we used a data set of over 400,000 patients with a wide range of medical conditions and illnesses.
To do this, we pooled all the data and looked at what was known about the treatment and the underlying cause of illness.
We then calculated how much patients in the same condition were spending on their fish therapy in comparison with the cost of treating the same person with the same treatment.
The researchers found that, on average, the price per treatment in fish therapy ranged from $1,200 to $4,400 (depending on the treatment type and treatment class).
The average cost for fish therapy was less than half of that, at just $1.25 per treatment.
But the difference in cost was huge, particularly in the case of the treatment class.
For example, in a fish therapy class, a single treatment would cost roughly $1 per treatment, while a treatment for an animal with a heart disease or other disease would cost about $3.
For an individual, this difference in price would be nearly a third of what they paid for a treatment.
In some cases, this is even more stark.
A fish therapy treatment for heart disease cost $7,800, compared with $20,800 for a conventional treatment.
If the fish treatment was a combination of a heart attack and other conditions, the difference would be about $8,500.
The authors note that there are a few important caveats.
First, these comparisons are based on only a small part of the market.
A good part of it is the treatment industry.
Fish therapy is expensive because it’s relatively easy to create a therapeutic dose, and manufacturers have to be able to provide the necessary equipment to manufacture it.
This has meant that the market has been flooded with fish therapy that’s been too expensive for the FDA to approve.
Second, it’s important to remember that these are only averages.
The price per dose varies by treatment class and type of fish.
For instance, a treatment class called “bio-healing” costs less per treatment than a treatment called “salve treatment” and has a much lower price tag per treatment—just $1 for each treatment class, compared to about $1 million per treatment class for conventional treatment classes.
And that means that some treatments may be priced more expensive than others.
A few other things to keep in mind: First, the authors looked at only people with a diagnosis of heart disease.
This could mean that there’s a different benefit for heart patients than for people with other conditions.
This is particularly true for fish therapies.
If you have an animal heart disease, it may make sense to treat your fish therapy with the animal than with the fish.
Second in the article is the fact that some fish therapy treatments are very expensive for an individual.
For people who are very healthy and who do not require treatment, it can be tempting to just use conventional treatments.
However, the prices of conventional treatments are much higher than the prices for fish treatments, which could lead to serious problems with the overall cost of treatment.
Third, the cost per treatment is an estimate, and it’s not necessarily accurate.
For the sake of the argument, let’s assume that the price of fish is $3 per treatment for a heart patient and $4 for a person with a type of heart illness called a primary cardiac disease.
The cost of fish treatment for this type of person would be around $15 per treatment at current prices, which is well above the average for conventional treatments of $6 per treatment and $6 for a primary cardiologist.
So, if we can estimate that fish therapy is actually cheaper for people who do need treatment, the benefit to people with fish treatment may be significant.
What does this mean for the average consumer?
If you are looking to get a treatment from a fish company, be aware that the cost can vary widely, and your doctor might recommend a different treatment for you.
The good news is that there is a wide variety of treatments out there that may be more appropriate for different circumstances, and you can always ask your doctor to discuss your specific situation with you.
To read more articles like this, please subscribe to New Scientist’s daily e-newsletter.
The best part about this study is that it shows that fish therapies are worth their cost. But